Sunday, 15 April 2018

How much milk does a breastfed baby drink in first week? Your body may be producing much more than you think!

Most people are familiar with the fact that in the very first days after birth small
quantities of colostrum are produced, and babies are therefore drinking small volumes.  Many of us have seen "belly balls" in antenatal classes or online sites, which often have a small marble representing day 1 and something like a ping pong ball for day 10.  The balls are usually described as representing the size of a newborn's stomach, and the small size of the ball and stomach is emphasised in order to reassure new parents that their newborn needs very small amounts of milk.  The aim is to reduce the concern of not enough milk.  These visual aids can be very helpful for reassuring parents in situations where everything is actually going well.  They can be helpful when milk volume is progressing as it needs to and weight gain is proceeding as expected, but the parents are questioning low supply as they weren't prepared for how frequently a breastfed baby may feed (most of us aren't).  The balls can illustrate the size of a feed and how a baby needs to keep feeding frequently.  On the other hand however if breastfeeding isn't going well, weight is continuing to drop or isn't increasing as expected after birth, the image of the small balls can be misleading as they don't always get across the message of just how rapidly we expect milk production to increase, and how milk intake increases by a significant amount every day over the first 10 days.

Without a sense of this rapid increase, a mum who has been advised that her baby isn't gaining well can be very confused if her HCP advises that she should give a certain volume of supplemental milk (ideally expressed milk) which to her seems much larger than the marble she may have in her mind.  In consults I've met women who had been advised they needed to increase supply but were contacting me as they felt their supply was fine, due to the fact that they could always express some milk.  When we discussed the volumes expected by day x the mums' were sometimes quite shocked at the volume expected and it allowed them to make sense of the advice given.  Of course there are also cases where parents are advised to give large supplements which aren't needed, and in any case where low weight gain is an issue, the first step is to evaluate and improve feeding.  Poor weight gain is an indicator of a feeding issue to be resolved, and although supplementing may be part of the solution, it is also sometimes suggested where not needed.

The purpose of this blog isn't to detail where and when supplements might be needed or how they should be given - those situations are as individual as each family.  This blog is designed to give an overview of how much milk a mum can expect to produce if a baby is drinking well over the first 10 days, or how much she can roughly expect to express (if exclusively expressing), and perhaps to make some sense of the volumes that parents may be asked to supplement.



Stomach Volume and Intake
This is where we first have to address the issue of the shooter marble at birth and some misconceptions around it.  The marble is used to illustrate a volume of around 7 ml, as research suggests this is an average volume in  a typical feed of colostrum may on day 1 [1].  

This 7 ml is the size of a feed, i.e. the volume of colostrum typically consumed.  It is not the size of a newborn baby's stomach.  In fact a newborn stomach is more likely to be around 20ml according to Nils Bergman's research [2].  A feed of colostrum does not fill the stomach to capacity at birth, nor does it provide the full energy requirements of a baby on day 1- but it is not designed to.  A baby is born with a store of glycogen to use as an energy store.  After birth hormones are released in order to liberate the glycogen store to provide the baby with extra energy.  It is estimated that 70% of the glucose requirements for the brain are met by this glycogen with the remainder coming from milk feedings and also from ketones in fat stores [1].  This is why a baby loses some weight after birth.  Again, it is by design that the fat stores are used to provide energy for the first day or 2, until larger volumes of milk are being produced and consumed.  Whereas some might suggest that babies should be given formula in order to ensure all their energy requirements come from a food source and therefore not have such a drop in weight, the research suggests that this actually affects their ability to access alternative sources of fuel, such as ketones, in their own body ([3][4][5]).

"As part of a newborn's natural adaptation from womb to world, in addition to usig his glycogen stores for bain fuel, he can access other fuel sources, such as ketone bodies and lactate.  Giving formula, however has been found to suppress a baby's ability to use ketone bodies for fuel.  The more formula he consumes, the less he can access this alternative fuel"
Nancy Mohrbacher - Breastfeeding Answers Made Simple [6]

This actually has a long term effect.  Although formula fed infants do use less fat stores, and therefore lose less weight, research has found that formula fed babies who gain significantly more weight in the first week than breastfed babies are at greater risk of obesity several decades later.  The researchers suggested that this first week was a period of "chronic disease programming"  [7].

Over the course of the first day intake could vary significantly depending on how often a baby feeds, and how well each feed goes.  Babies can be quite sleepy after birth perhaps due to labour drugs or birth interventions, and whereas one baby may only be feeding 6 times in that first 24 hours, another baby with a straight forward birth who doesn't have separation from mum and is held skin to skin may feed 12 times or more.  Those babies can clearly be taking in quite significantly different amounts of milk.  Research shows a range in the first 24hr of 7-123 ml [1].  These are hugely different calorie intakes.  Allowing calories of 53.6 kcal per 100ml in colostrum  [8] a baby taking in only 7ml over a whole day is receiving just under 4 calories from food.  A baby taking in 123ml is receiving about 66 calories.  Those 2 babies will have very different demands from their glycogen and fat stores to make up the required calories.  Walker lists the average colostrum intake over the first 24 hours as 37ml.  The more frequently that a baby feeds in the first 24 hours the more calories are available to baby, less fat stores are needed, and thus weight loss reduces.


Day 2

In the days following birth the level of progesterone in the body from pregnancy drops.  This increases the volume of colostrum.  On day 2, milk intake is much higher than day 1.  One study details an average of 185ml over day 2, with a lower range of 12ml and an upper range of 379ml [9].    This would be an average of perhaps 15-20 ml in each feed.  Another Dutch study listed in Walker's book [1] placed the day 2 intake at 44 - 335ml with an average intake of 14ml at each feed Milk production has effectively doubled between day 1 and day 2.


Day 3

It is common for milk volume to increase significantly around day 3.  In lactation texts this is referred to as "the onset of copious milk production" or "secretory activation".  Many people refer to it as "milk coming in".  At this stage progesterone has dropped to a level that allows the walls of the breast ducts and alveoli to become more 'watertight' and to contain more milk (discussed more in this previous blog).  Milk volume increases dramatically from this point onwards.  Average milk intake on day 3 is 408ml [1] with a lower range of 98ml and upper range of 775ml), which may work out as approx 30-50ml in each feed, again effectively doubling from day 2.  At this stage women often feel their breasts as being much fuller and often start to become aware of having milk ejections (or letdowns) while feeding.
Although it is common for milk to come in on day 3, it can be delayed by a day or 2 for many reasons.
Milk volume is also affected by whether it is a first baby or a subsequent baby.  One study found that women who had previously breastfed were around 1 day ahead of first time mothers in terms of milk volume, producing 142ml more on day 3, so volumes can vary stubstantially.


Day 4

Day 4 sees another increase to an average of 625 ml a day [1] (lower range 378 ml and upper range 876 ml), which may be around 50-70ml in each feed if you assume 8-12 feeds a day.  Nils Bergman however suggests that a physiological feeding pattern is for a newborn is to feed roughly once an hour taking around 20-30ml in each feed.  This would give a similar volume of around 600ml.  The amount of milk a mother has on day 4 is predictive of her milk supply going forward (unless there is an intervention to change volume).  One U.S. study looking at exclusively expressing found that milk volume on day 4 was predictive of milk volume at 6 weeks [10], so a good supply on day 4 is a good prediction of good volume weeks later.


Day 7

"When breastfeeding is going well, by the end of the first week, a mother's milk production has increased from an average of 37ml to 56ml on the first day to a mean of 610ml per day by Day 7"
Nancy Mohrbacher - Breastfeeding Answers Made Simple [6]

This average on day 7 is lower than the average on day 4, but this may simply reflect that more women are producing around 600ml by day 7, and there isn't the large upper and lower range difference.

Milk volume continues to increase after day 7 to around 800ml a day which would be considered a full supply.  Some women may be producing 1000ml or more, and obviously those feeding twins or other mutiples will be producing significantly more if breastfeeding exclusively.


Making Sense of Weight Loss / Gain

This is quite incredible when you think about it.  The birthing body changes from producing around 1 oz of colostrum over the course of day 1 to over 20oz 1 week later.  If breastfeeding is going well and you are simply putting baby to the breast on cue women often have no idea of the large volumes of milk they have suddenly started producing in such a short time frame.  Conversely, because this isn't often talked about, women who have perhaps not had the best start to breastfeeding, and are expressing in the first week often don't have any idea of how much milk they should be getting when expressing, or how much their baby needs.

It's also only when you consider the incredible change in volume in the first week that we can often start to make sense of volumes that are suggested when giving milk from bottle / cup /syringe etc.  If a baby is not latching on day 5 and a HCP suggests giving 60 ml of milk (ideally expressed breastmilk) every 3 hours, this can seem like a large amount for a baby born only 5 days ago if your memory holds an image of a shooter marble.  It's only when you consider that a baby may be drinking 20oz on day 5 that this makes any sense.

As the studies show, the milk intake can vary massively from baby to baby.  A woman who has breastfed before, who had an uncomplicated birth, baby latches well and is feeding frequently may be producing significantly more milk in the first few days than a first time mother who had separation from baby after birth, is having problems with baby feeding, and/or there is infrequent feeding.  Birth weight will make a difference too.  A 9lb baby is going to have different energy requirements than a 6lb baby, and will therefore have different milk needs.  A 9lb baby may indeed be drinking 600ml of milk on day 5, and a 6lb baby may be drinking 500ml.  Both may be having their calorie needs met.  In contrast though a 7lb baby who hasn't been breastfeeding well and is drinking less than 500ml of milk on day 5 may be losing weight, or at least not gaining weight.

All of these factors can lead to very different pictures of weight loss and weight gain after birth.   We do expect babies to lose some weight after birth, due to using up fat stores.  They will also lose some weight due to fluids, and if a mother was given IV fluids during birth this may increase weight loss.  This is normal and expected and in breastfeeding forums I often see conversations about weight loss of up to 10% being ok.  This is both true and not true.  It's true that weight loss of over 10% requires intervention, but it's not true that weight loss of 9 or 10% would be considered average and therefore we shouldn't be concerned about it.  The average weight loss of a baby is 5% - 7% with the lowest weight occurring around day 3 or 4 - essentially just before "milk comes in".  According to the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine:


"Although weight loss in the range of 8–10% may be within normal limits if all else is going well and the physical examination is normal, it is an indication for careful assessment and possible breastfeeding assistance. Weight loss in excess of this may be an indication of inadequate milk transfer or low milk production, but a thorough evaluation is required before automatically ordering supplementation"
Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Clinical Protocol #3 [11]

Once milk comes in and babies are drinking larger volumes weight should start to increase.  This previous blog on weight gain discusses the expected pattern in detail, but in short a baby is expected to gain around 30g a day from this point, with 20g a day being the lower end of normal.  A baby who is gaining under 20g a day is also considered at need of intervention.  That intervention may be correcting positioning and attachment so that a baby gains better.  It may be feeding more frequently and/or swapping sides more frequently.  It may be expressing to increase milk supply and topping up feeds with the expresssed milk.  In some cases it may be using supplemental donor or formula milk temporarily while building up supply by feeding and expressing.


Takeaways

There were a few things that prompted this blog.  I've been mulling it over for a few months as I frequently find the same conversations popping up in breastfeeding forums.  Conversations where a HCP has suggested top ups (say 50ml) for a baby who isn't gaining as expected and some reply to say that babies have tiny stomachs and don't need this volume.  Others comment to say that giving that amount of top up will decrease her milk supply.  While both of these may be true in some situations, they are not in others.  A 2 day old won't need milk feeds of 50g.  Giving a 4 day old baby 50ml feeds of a milk other than mum's milk without building or sustaining her milk supply will impact milk production.  A one week old baby who is gaining 15g a day probably doesn't need 50g topups after each feed either - optimising breastfeeding would likely be enough to shift that baby into normal range.  On the other hand, a baby who is 10 days old, hasn't gained any weight since birth, is sleepy, is 11% below birth weight and a breastfeeding assessment shows very little milk transfer at the breast may need that much larger supplement while the breastfeeding problem is resolved and mum works on increasing milk production.  Each situation is very different and breastfeeding parents are often quite unaware of just how much milk their baby needs to regain birth weight or how quickly the volumes should increase.  I often see other conversations on forums or talk to parents who feel they have plenty of milk because they can express 30ml.  That 30ml expression may be a sign of great supply on day 3 or 4.  It may also be a good sign at 3 weeks immediately after a good effective breastfeed,  but is much less reassuring at 3 weeks if expressed 2-3 hours after the last feed/expression particularly in conjunction with a baby who is gaining perhaps 2 oz a week.

So I suppose the takeways I want to get across with this blog are these:
Yes colostrum is in very small quantities in the first day or 2 but it ramps up extremely quickly if all is going well, and consequently the amount that a baby drinks ramps up very quickly too.  We do expect a baby's weight to drop after birth, and it is by design, but by day 5 a baby should be gaining weight and ideally should gain at around 30g a day and to do this there needs to be significant milk intake.  The earlier and more frequently a baby breastfeeds in the early days the better this will be for milk production, which is why mothers are encouraged to start expressing early and often if their baby is not latching.  This blog is not meant to scare people about volumes.  I can understand why someone may be sitting in a hospital on day 1 reading this with a non latching baby, worried about only being able to express one ml at each expression session.  To you I want to extend reassurance.  Often parents are told to express and feed every 3 hours, but as I explored in a previous blog - this means at least every 3 hours.  If you express 1 ml every 3 hours you might get 8ml over the course of the day.  If you express every hour however, you may get closer to 24ml (remember the lower range found in the study above for day 1 was 7ml so it is also normal to have less).  The more you express, the better stimulation you provide and the better your milk volume will be on day 2 and day 3 etc.  Once your milk comes in around day 3, you will also likely find expressing much easier.
If your baby is at day 6 or 7 and isn't yet gaining weight you will likely be advised to start expressing in addition to breastfeeding to help raise your supply.  The volumes I have mentioned above of 600ml a day at 1 week may seem enormous when you look at your expressed milk.  The good news is that milk production really does ramp up extremely quickly when given the right stimulation.  If your baby didn't manage to get all the stimulation needed in the first few days then expressing can resolve that.  Hormones are primed for milk production in the first couple of weeks, and getting an expressing routine going can turn things around entirely in a few days.  Just as an effectively feeding baby can build milk production from a few mls to 600ml in a week, so can a pump.  The first 2-3 weeks are the easiest time to very quickly build milk supply to volumes that are needed, and sometimes expression is needed for a baby who didn't get the best start and isn't feeding effectively.  Raising supply through pumping can actually help a baby to feed better (bigger volumes flow more freely).

Babies do need significant quantities of milk in the latter part of first week and beyond, and weight gain is the best indicator of whether they are getting enough milk.  If everything is going well and all feeding is at the breast, you'll likely have no idea of the amazing volume your body is producing.  If weight gain isn't going well then your baby may need some help in getting your milk production built up as needed.  Now, there's no doubt that in some areas here in NI top ups are suggested far too quickly and it may be that far too large topups are suggested in some cases, but it's also true that sometimes supplemental milk is needed and the volumes may surprise you if you have been told that babies only need a few mls of milk.  Those who work in breastfeeding support walk a fine line when suggesting that more milk is needed.  We want babies to get the optimum amount of milk.  We want that to be at the breast.  We want mums to have a comfortable, enjoyable breastfeeding experience and to have an ample supply of milk.  If a baby is struggling with weight gain we want to find the best way to preserve breastfeeding, to build the milk supply while also giving baby adequate calories.  That involves the minimum amount of supplement needed, but enough to move weight gain into the normal range.  In some cases a comment on a forum telling a mum to feed more frequently rather than give a top up may be correct.  In other cases however that might cause a poorly feeding baby to expend more energy at the breast, further impact weight gain and not raise milk production.  A solution that worked for one mum, will not be the right solution for another who is in very different circumstances that may not have been described clearly on a forum post.  Encouraging a mother to Ignore suggestions to express and/or supplement can be damaging, as can not having good truthful support about when extra milk is needed.  Intervening to raise supply early is usually simple, whereas letting things run without intervening can lead to babies not having regained birthweight at 6, 7, 8, or even 9 weeks and this is when the outcome for breastfeeding is deeply impacted.  It is relatively easy to significantly increase supply with the right stimulation in the first 3 weeks.  It is much more difficult after 6 weeks, so getting early support with breastfeeding is key.

If you are concerned about milk intake, or your baby's weight gain ask for a breastfeeding assessment from your HCP or look for a local IBCLC (International Board Certified Lactation Consultant) or breastfeeding counselor to check if there is an issue which might need some extra support.  When there is a weight gain issue generally all that is needed is support around helping baby to feed better at the breast, and perhaps increasing the frequency of feeds.  If top ups are suggested discuss a plan with your caregiver.  The plan shouldn't just be about those top-ups, but should be about increasing supply so that you can then move back to exclusive breastfeeding.  Expressing and supplementing breastfeeds are almost always temporary if you have the right support.

When everything is going well with breastfeeding and you are feeding exclusively at the breast you will have no idea just how much milk your baby is drinking, but if our breasts were transparent or we had volume measurements we may be very surprised at just how generous our overflowing milk ducts are!

www.carolsmyth.co.uk                                                        






Further Reading

[1]  Walker, M. Breastfeeding Management for the Clinician: Jones & Bartlett Publishers, 2013 -  https://tinyurl.com/ycubbg7c
[2]  Neonatal stomach volume and physiology suggest feeding at 1-h intervals.  Nils J. Bergman Acta Paediatr. 2013 Aug; 102(8): 773–777. Published online 2013 Jun 3. doi: 10.1111/apa.12291
[3] Nutritional factors that affect the postnatal metabolic adaptation of full-term small- and large-for-gestational-age infants. Laura de Rooy, Jane Hawdon  Pediatrics. 2002 Mar; 109(3): E42.
[4] Controversies Regarding Definition of Neonatal Hypoglycemia: Suggested Operational Thresholds. Marvin Cornblath, Jane M. Hawdon, Anthony F. Williams, Albert Aynsley-Green, Martin P. Ward-Platt, Robert Schwartz,Satish C. Kalhan Pediatrics Special Article May 2000, VOLUME 105 / ISSUE 5 
[5] Hawdon JM, Ward Platt MP, Aynsley-Green A. Prevention and management of neonatal hypoglycaemia. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal edition. 1994;70(1):60-65.
[6] Mohrbacher, N. Breastfeeding Answers Made Simple: Hale Publishing, 2010
[7] Weight gain in the first week of life and overweight in adulthood: a cohort study of European American subjects fed infant formula. Nicolas Stettler, Virginia A. Stallings, Andrea B. Troxel, Jing Zhao, Rita Schinnar, Steven E. Nelson, Ekhard E. Ziegler, Brian L. Strom
Circulation. 2005 Apr 19; 111(15): 1897–1903. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000161797.67671.A7
[8] Hester SN, Hustead DS, Mackey AD, Singhal A, Marriage BJ. Is the Macronutrient Intake of Formula-Fed Infants Greater Than Breast-Fed Infants in Early Infancy? Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2012;2012:891201. doi:10.1155/2012/891201.
[9] Studies in human lactation: milk volumes in lactating women during the onset of lactation and full lactation. M. C. Neville, R. Keller, J. Seacat, V. Lutes, M. Neifert, C. Casey, J. Allen, P. Archer
Am J Clin Nutr. 1988 Dec; 48(6): 1375–1386.
[10] Comparison of milk output between mothers of preterm and term infants: the first 6 weeks after birth.  Pamela D. Hill, Jean C. Aldag, Robert T. Chatterton, Michael Zinaman J Hum Lact. 2005 Feb; 21(1): 22–30. doi: 10.1177/0890334404272407 
[11] Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Clinical Protocol #3 - http://www.npqic.org/files/125203316.pdf 


Friday, 29 December 2017

Having problems with getting a comfortable latch? - Don't forget your baby's feet!


Photo by Danielle MacInnes on Unsplash
Positioning and attachment is key to allowing a baby to open the mouth wide and attach deeply to the breast, and in turn that deep attachment is key to a comfortable, pain-free breastfeed.  We want some breast to be in baby's mouth rather than just the nipple, so that the nipple is positioned away from hard tissues like the gums and instead is framed by the wide palate and a soft tongue.

In earlier blogs I have talked about the importance of laid back feeding positions in order to trigger a baby's innate feeding reflexes to get a comfortable deep latch.  Often when I describe these positions, people they tell me that they've tried it but just can't seem to make it work and their baby doesn't seem to be able to latch on.  Often when I see them we work on tiny adjustments to help the baby find it's feet -  literally.  I often spend time talking about feet and feet placement - which might seem unrelated to breastfeeding on the face of it, but in fact is hugely important.

Babies use their feet when latching on.  They are part of the beautiful and intricate pattern of reflex behaviours that lead to an instinctive latch on.

In a 2008 study by Diane Colson, researchers noticed that mothers performed the same very specific movements in order to trigger feeding reflexes.  These are part of a mother's feeding reflexes.  They found that when mothers were in a laid back position with hands free they stroked their baby's feet which triggered toe fanning and toe grasping, which in turn triggered lip and tongue reflexes and helped the baby to attach to the breast and to feed.  You can think of this also in terms of how we are often told to tickle a baby's feet if they are falling asleep at the breast.  It's not just to wake the baby up, it's to specifically trigger feeding.

Hands on therapists, such as craniosacral therapists, osteopaths etc often work with long fascial lines in the body, and what's called the "deep front line" does run from the feet at one end right to the hyoid bone and muscles at the other.  As I explained in this blog, the tongue is attached to the hyoid bone and jaw and tongue movement is affected by hyoid muscles, so this may be part of the system link between that foot pressure and feeding reflexes.

On a more basic observational level however, babies just need to use their feet in order to feel positionally stable and to be able to adjust their bodies to latch on well.   If you have ever seen a video of the breast crawl after birth (where a newborn crawls to the breast and self attaches), you will see how important feet position is.  The baby plants it's feet on mum's body and then pushes forward, pulling the legs up, planting them in and then pushing again.  Moving like this, the baby feels stable, and it also allows the chin to deeply contact the breast which again aids in getting a deep attachment at the breast.  If a baby doesn't have this kind of contact, or doesn't feel positionally stable at the breast, it is much harder to get a good comfortable attachment.

So if you are struggling with getting a comfortable feed and you just can see that there is a shallow attachment and just can't figure out how to get it any deeper, look at your baby's feet.  Are they in contact with something - either you or perhaps a cushion?  If you are in a laid back position perhaps try having your baby lying along your body with feet against your thigh, or at at 45 degree angle with feet against your groin.  If you had a C-section and want to protect your wound you can have baby more across your body, but just check that your baby's feet are touching your side, or your arm, or a cushion.  If you prefer to use a cradle hold, make sure that you are also allowing your baby to feel positionally stable by ensuring that baby's whole body is firmly against yours with chin touching the breast and feet against something.  If you are still struggling in either position - take another look at the hips.  Both of your baby's hips should be touching you - your baby's pelvis should be flat against you - like froggy legs.  If one hip is against you and the other is angled away - your baby may not have good positional stability.

I often think there is too much focus on "the latch" in breastfeeding.  The latch is vitally important, but lots of things feed into "the latch" and how a baby attaches.  Good attachment isn't all about the lips flanging or  lining up nose to nipple etc.  Its about a bigger picture of how 2 people move, how comfortable and stable they both feel and how that leads to a comfortable feed.  Help your baby to find it's feet.







www.carolsmyth.co.uk


References
Optimal positions for the release of primitive neonatal reflexes stimulating breastfeeding.  Colson et al 2008  2008 Jul;84(7):441-9. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.12.003. Epub 2008 Feb 19. - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18243594

Videos showing laid back breastfeeding - 
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpJt_90JhxkPJ6wQ-6VNggkqw0aWCfRD3

Fascial trains - The Deep Front Line  http://healingartsce.com/advancedanatomymyofascialpg4.html
and  https://www.burrelleducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/What-are-the-Myofascial-Lines.pdf

Friday, 10 November 2017

Quick Thoughts from Northern Ireland Breastfeeding Research

This morning I attended the Advancing Breastfeeding Research & Practice conference organised by NIPHRN (Northern Ireland Public Health Research Network) and DMRS (Doctoral Midwifery Research Society) which was held at Ulster University.  This event looked at current research, and meta-analyses of breastfeeding interventions aimed at increasing breastfeeding rates, as well as discussing the importance of online peer support.

A common theme that came through the day is that what is currently being done to increase breastfeeding rates is not working.  Interventions which work in other areas of the world, don't seem to work here, due to the culture around feeding in UK.  New ideas are needed, some kind of a radical approach.  An update from PHA Health Intelligence found that women felt there was a lack of consistency between midwives / Health Visitors, and a lack of support from some.  Alison McFadden from Dundee University stated evidence that many HCPs don't have the required knowledge, attitudes or skills around breastfeeding but there was a lack of evidence of what works to equip staff effectively.  She stated that there was a lack of quality information on whether increasing breastfeeding education in HCPs actually increases breastfeeding rates.  This might seem surprising, but I'm sure we've all been to education or training sessions where we didn't actually apply what we learned!

The importance on online peer support was discussed and the session on the local BFNI Facebook group brought some audible gasps when the volume of posts and support interactions was given.

Two sessions that I want to draw out a little here however were the sessions on Motivational Theory and Behavioural Change.  The Motivational Theory talk emphaised the importance of Self Efficacy and of Value. That to motivate any specific behaviour (like breastfeeding) you must have a balance of feeling capable and feeling like there is value to that behaviour.  It talked about how the breastfeeding support is currently unbalanced, with Value being emphasised to women prenatally during antenatal education, but at this time they are not given information to feel confident in how to do it.  Prenatally interventions emphasise Value but not Self Efficacy.  After birth, they are given support around Self Efficacy (practical support on how to breastfeed) but are not given information on the value of breastfeeding (there is no real distinction drawn between breastfeeding and artificial feeding).  We have a wider issue within society and health care provision that  breastfeeding is not always valued.  The session on behavioural change talked about the 3 components of change which are Capability, Motivation and Opportunity (Means, Motive and Opportunity by another name), and how each of these need to be addressed in interventions to change behaviour.

In all of these talks the interventions focused on breastfeeding women - trying to drive change in pregnant and postnatal women, but the Lancet Series on Breastfeeding (published earlier this year) was very clear when it said, 



"success in breastfeeding is not the sole responsibility of a woman 
— the promotion of breastfeeding is a collective societal responsibility.”

What was clearly presented to the audience today was a message that we need to do something quite different when thinking about interventions - so I'd like to propose something different.  We've tried interventions focusing on the pregnant and postnatal women, and we're not making any significant changes.  We know that there is an issue within healthcare.  Women report issues around perceived lack of Value in breastfeeding and lack of effective support from HCPs.  That hits the Lack of Value and Self Efficacy strands of motivation.  Women report that HCPs are very quick to suggest artificial milks both in hospital and in the community.   Value and Motivation - how about we address these within the care provision setting rather than focusing on pregnant and breastfeeding women?  How about we design interventions to drive behaviour change within healthcare as a driver of community change?  How about we motivate HCPs to better support and value breastfeeding?  We have some fabulous champions of breastfeeding within midwifery, nursing and medicine, but having some champions is not enough.  When a fundamental part of a job is providing breastfeeding information and support, everyone needs to be a champion.

A couple of days ago a pregnant woman told me that in an antenatal visit she expressed a wish to breastfeed, and her concerns about it since she difficulty breastfeeding previously.  She asked her midwives what help she could have.  She told me that her midwife said, "Sure, why not just give a bottle?".  In that one sentence we see both lack of value and lack of Self Efficacy.  How about instead of focusing responsibility on the woman (as the Lancet says), we motivate HCPs to change behaviour in how they respond to breastfeeding challenges.  How about we target interventions to promote the value of breastfeeding within health care professions?

How's that as a radical idea??
















Sunday, 22 October 2017

Breast Shaping - It is ok to hold your breast!

Breast shaping (shaping / holding your breast with your hand in order to help your baby get a deeper latch can be very helpful for many babies in the early weeks of breastfeeding.  Recently, however, when I've suggested breast shaping to women, they are more and more frequently saying to me, "But is it ok to do that?  Won't I get blocked ducts?"  Generally they have been told by someone to stop doing it.  I am really uncomfortable with women being made to feel like they cannot put their own hands on their own body to help them with breastfeeding.  So let's talk about breast shaping, and lets talk about blocked ducts.

Breast shaping can help young babies latch for lots of reasons.  If a mum has flatter nipples, it can help to get the nipple deeper into baby's mouth.  If mum is engorged and the breast is very rounded it can help baby to get more of a grip on the breast.  If the breast is large and heavy it helps to lift the weight off baby's chin and chest.  Taking the weight off the lower jaw also helps babies to get their chin forward and move their tongue well.  For this reason it also helps tongue tied babies, or babies who's tongue is restricted due to head moulding from birth, to optimise their tongue and jaw movement.    It can also help a mum with larger breasts to be able to see her nipple and baby's mouth more clearly.

Like everything, we have itemised and named different ways to hold the breast.  Common terms are the C hold, the U hold and the Scissor hold.  


By naming them we kind of legitimise them as a technique with correct and incorrect usage, when in fact women throughout time have just used their hands on their body instinctively to help their baby, and they do it because it works and it does help.  In fact I think it is when women are instinctively using their hands that someone says to then, "Oh don't do that - it can cause blocked ducts".


Shapes and holds come in many forms.  The guide as to which hold might help best is the position of baby's mouth approaching the breast.  In the diagrams above I have added a little text explaining when they are often useful (If you click on the image it will enlarge).  The point of shaping is to make the breast a little narrower to aid with attachment.  The C hold for example is useful if a baby is laying up and down your body.  In this position the thumb is parallel with baby's top lip and the fingers parallel with the lower lip.  This hold wouldn't help with a cradle position as it would actually make the area that the baby was going to latch to even larger.  It would be essentially like turning a burger sideways and asking us to bite it.  In cradle hold therefore, the U hold (or alternatives) work better because it narrows the breast in the correct direction.  In U hold the thumb and fingers are parallel with the lips of a baby latching in cradle hold.


Does breast shaping cause blocked ducts?
The idea of blocked ducts can be frightening, particularly if you've had mastitis before or know someone who had mastitis.  The most common reason for blocked ducts is from milk not flowing freely.  The most common reason for that, in turn, is a baby not feeding well or not frequently enough. The situation where a baby is not latching on well and/or not removing milk well from the breast will increase the risk of milk stasis and a blocked duct.  A missed feed (e.g. baby sleeping longer than usual, or perhaps disruptions to feeds around holiday times) will disrupt the usual frequent flow of milk and increase the risk of a blocked duct.  Any kind of scheduling of feeds has the same risk.  Oversupply can also increase the risk just due to the volume of milk which might remain static in the breast after a feed.  The worry about oversupply is more common that actual oversupply however, in my experience - particularly around the 3 weeks mark.  Inflammation also raises the risk.  That inflammation may come from an infection, from allergy, from trauma.  Trauma to the nipple (usually from poor attachment at the breast) increases the risk of infection and of blockages.  Finally blockages can be caused by pressure on the breast.  This may be from sleeping position (particularly sleeping on your front), it may be from a tight fitting bra or clothes, and the theory goes - from fingers holding the breast.  Stress is also a significant risk factor.

To get an example of how often fingers/hands actually caused blocked ducts, I decided to have a look at the literature today.  There is plenty of literature on mastitis and showing blocked ducts as a precursor of mastitis, but not so much on the causes of the blocked ducts themselves.  Nevertheless this is what I found. 


A 1998 study by Fetherson [1] found that in first time mothers the risk factors for mastitis were, 


"blocked duct(s), restriction from a tight bra, attachment difficulties, and nipple pain during a feed were the significant predictors for mastitis "


It's worth remembering here that the tight bra and attachment difficulties (which cause nipple pain) are a cause of blocked ducts - which then may progress to mastitis, so the original issue was likely one of these.  In mothers who had breastfed previously the risk factors were stated as follows:



"blocked duct(s) and increased levels of stress were the significant precursors for mastitis"

A 2006 article by Suzanne Hertzel Campbell [2] in the Journal of Human Lactation on causes of recurrent blocked ducts states the following:



"Factors that can lead to plugged ducts include insufficiently emptied breasts related to following arbitrary cultural rules about restricting or timing feeds or sideswitching.... Older infants’ developmental changes, including increased mobility and greater interest in their environment, lead to sudden pulling at the nipple and less than optimal positioning. Infants with older siblings may be exposed to more distractions, causing them to quit feeding early and/or to nurse less often. In addition, at this age infants may start sleeping longer during the night, resulting in decreased breast emptying. Outside environmental factors that cause sustained pressure on the breast, such as infant carriers (especially front-holding), heavy purses or diaper bags, and restrictive clothing (eg, tight, underwire, or sport bras, bathing suit), may also interrupt the milk flow, resulting in plugged ducts.5,6 Other factors that may affect the woman’s physical and emotional health are fatigue and maternal stress."


I have bolded "sustained pressure" here, because I think this is extremely significant when we are considering the effect of holding the breast.  Lying on the breast for several hours, wearing a tight fitting bra for a day or overnight, wearing a top or dress which is tight for a day, is very different to holding the breast for latching on, or holding the breast for a short time during a feed.  Even if women need to hold the breast for most of the feed they generally shift during that feed.  It's uncomfortable for the shoulders, the back etc for a woman to hold one arm and hand position for the entire length of time that a newborn may be at the breast, so women move.  They shift their hands, they adjust their shoulders.  I don't think I have ever seen a woman rigidly hold a hand position for long periods while a baby feeds.  This idea of hands causing an issue, I believe also may come from an older idea of how the ducts operate within the breast.  It used to be thought that ducts move in lines directly to the nipple.  Like a tree, twigs lead to branches, which lead into larger branches, which lead into the trunk.  What we now know from scans however is that the ducts operate in an interconnecting network.  There are connections between lobes (branches) in the breast, unlike a tree (Geddes 2007 [3]).  Milk can flow freely through from one lobe to another to reach the nipple.

One other piece of information to consider here is what we as breastfeeding supporters often suggest if a baby's weight gain is low, and that is breast compression!  We actually suggest putting hands on the breast, and compressing in order to increase milk flow and to keep the baby sucking.  No one seems to see the contradiction here when telling women not to touch their breasts to help with attachment.  Breast compression works and is a helpful technique, and a technique which is hands on.

As a society we are all too frequently afraid to touch our breasts.  We have educational posters and videos to teach us how to check for breast cancer because we are unfamiliar with handling our breasts.  We are unfamiliar with our own bodies, how they feel and how they work, and this is part of what makes breastfeeding difficult.  Women since time immemorial have held their breasts while breastfeeding because for those women it helps.  It works.  
If your baby attaches better with breast shaping I would argue that it decreases your risk of blocked ducts, since poor attachment and drainage is likely the primary cause of blockages.

Get to know your body and your breasts, and if you instinctively feel that holding will help - try it.  If you feel your baby is bobbing about at the nipple and having trouble with attaching or getting the nipple deeply into their mouth, it's ok to try breast shaping.  If your baby latches on well with breast shaping but falls off when you let go, it's ok to hold the breast.    If it feels better and it is working, then it works for you.  Most of all, know that it's ok to touch your own body.  It's ok to hold your breast.  







References

[1] Risk Factors for Lactation Mastitis - Catherine FetherstonRM, MSc, IBCLC.  Journal of Human Lactation Vol 14, Issue 2, pp. 101 - 109  http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/089033449801400209 

[2]  Recurrent Plugged Ducts - 
Suzanne Hetzel Campbell.  Journal of Human Lactation 
[3]   2007 Nov-Dec;52(6):556-63.Inside the lactating breast: the latest anatomy research.  Geddes DT

Saturday, 5 August 2017

World Breastfeeding Week 2017 - A Call To Action

I've been pretty quiet over World Breastfeeding Week, as I am most years, to be honest.  I'm conflicted by it, and I think many people don't fully understand what WBW is.   Perhaps it's only through writing this blog that I've gained a much clearer sense myself.  There seems to be this idea that it is simply about celebrating breastfeeding, and so we should talk about it, and share pics and stories.  In fact, each year World Breastfeeding Week (WBW) has a defined purpose and intent.  So, yes of course we should celebrate breastfeeding but that's not the core of what WBW is.  What is the purpose for 2017?  

"WBW2017 will call on advocates and activists, decision-makes, and celebrants to forge new and purposeful partnerships. Together lets attract political support, media attention, participation of young people and widen our pool or celebrants and supporters"
(From worldbreastfeedingweek.org)

Forge New and purposeful partnerships.  Attract political support?  Is that what this week is doing?  
What I see in my newsfeed, my emails and professional groups is lots of fabulous training made free this week.  That is brilliant, and it helps me as a professional to help support those who are having problems with breastfeeding, but does it forge new and purposeful partnerships?  Does it involve political decision makers?  I have to say No.

What about media attention?  Well let's face it, the media is, at best, "conflicted" on breastfeeding, and no less so in WBW.  I just checked what my email digest of breastfeeding news stories has brought to me the last few days.  This is the list of breastfeeding news story headlines in the order I received, from most recent to least recent:

1. Weird breastfeeding questions answered by lactation consultants.  (Mmhmm, you don't need media training to understand the subliminal effect that putting those first 2 words together creates)
BTW, a sub story linked from this was: 
Breastfeeding moms in developing nations have it even harder than in Canada (subtext here clearly is, "suck it up and stop complaining about lack of support.")

2.  Breastfeeding is currently failing to reach recommended standards across the globe (yep, tell everyone breastfeeding is failing but not how to fix it - that'll help)

3.  Mum who filmed herself breastfeeding her 4 year old daughter is called 'sick' by cruel online trolls.

4.  Breastfeeding:  Not a single country in the world today meets WHO, UNICEF standards (seems to me this is more of a celebration of formula marketing tbh)

5.  Teach pupils about breastfeeding say Royal College doctors. 

Now this last one is helpful.  This is something which would genuinely widen the participation of young people and widen the pool of celebrants and supporters.  That's 1 story out of the latest 5 that I received.  Let's move on to the next 5:

6.  Don't infantilise women.  Tell them how tough breastfeeding can be.  Ok this doesn't necessarily celebrate breastfeeding, but actually it's a message which I agree with - although I'd word it differently. Women do need to know that breastfeeding takes effort.  So does birth.  We infantilise women there too.  We need to tell women about their strengths and how they can meet the challenges of birth and breastfeeding and to learn about the power in their bodies.  This is my take on it.

7.  Presidents daughter speaks out after backlash over her breastfeeding photo

8.  Social media filling mums with anxiety over being perfect and breastfeeding (again anyone trained in media will understand how this associations breastfeeding with "perfection" and that this actually makes it seem to be something unattainable and unrealistic)

9.  Binky Felsted admits she felt uncomfortable breastfeeding in public for the first time

10.  Breastfeeding - the latest competition in the parenting game.

Sigh!  So are you starting to see why I feel conflicted about World Breastfeeding Week?  These stories and the negative media attention happens all year round, but more focus is placed on it during this week, and overwhelmingly the media is not working towards the goals of WBW2017.  At the minute the media, in the main, doesn't seem to be a purposeful participant.

WBW2017 calls for advocates and activists to "attract political support".  What are we doing to achieve that this week?  We do know exactly what needs to be done.  The Lancet report last year spelled out exactly what is needed to increase breastfeeding rates.  I blogged about it in this piece about Jamie Oliver.  The report clearly stated that there needed to be political will to promote, support and protect breastfeeding.  Protection of breastfeeding already happening is the first step.  That includes legislation to protect breastfeeding.  Here in N.I. our legislation is the weakest around breastfeeding in all of the UK.  Breastfeeding in public is protected in N.I. under the Sex Discrimination Act 1976.  Under the act 
a woman is protected as part of her maternity status until 26 weeks post partum.  Breastfeeding is a continuation of pregnancy and is the normal feeding method for a baby and therefore the breastfeeding dyad is protected in public.  This, however is woefully inadequate.  What about the 27 week old baby?  THe WHO recommend breastfeeding continues alongside completmentary foods until 2 years and beyond.  What about families who don't fit into the mainstream maternity model, not to mention that feeding isn't specifically mentioned.
Legislation in the rest of the UK is much stronger and has clearer intention.  In England and Wales the law specifically mentions "breastfeeding" for the avoidance of any doubt.  In Scotland the law specifically protects feeding of babies up to 2 years.

So what's happening here in NI.  Well the previous Health Minister, Michelle O'Neill did commit last year to bringing stronger legislation into effect, but shortly after this Stormont collapsed.  So far, during WBW2017  I have seen one local political voice on social media talk about legislation this week.  That was Michelle Gildnernew.  I know that Claire Hanna MLA is also speaking about legislation at the Belfast Breastival today.  I'm disappointed not to be able to make the Breastival today.  I'm out of the country, but I massively applaud the organisers of this event.  This truely is an event which has worked to the goals of WBW2017.  How do we as breastfeeding advocates and supporters carry this work forward?  Well, I would suggest that we take action.  

Claire Hanna and Michelle Gildernew are vocal on this issue as they are/have been breastfeeding mothers.  They personally understand how women feel about breastfeeding in public and the support and protection needed.  But how do public representatives become champions of a cause if they do not have a personal interest.  Look at Owen Smith right now and his intervention over vaginal mesh in NI. This happened due to lobbying from affected women and is progressing even though Stormont is not functioning.  Look at the effect that the Irish language demonstrations or marriage equality parades are having.  They are changing the political conversations here.  This paragraph is not meant to be a political statement about any party or cause, but what I am saying is that in order to make political change, there has to be pressure.  Change only comes through pressure.  It's the same in all things.  In evolution, pressure from the environment causes mutation.  In labour pressure causes birth.  Pressure causes change.
So if we want WBW2017 to really make change, then where is the pressure?  WE are the pressure... But only if we apply the pressure.  If you want more support for breastfeeding here, if you are feeling disillusioned by WBW, then BE the pressure.  Contact your MLA this week and tell them why this legislation is important.  If Stormont doesn't look likely to return in the Autumn, don't let it drift.  Write to the Secretary of State.  Write to the Shadow Secretary of State.  Demand this change in legislation.  No one else is going to do this, if we don't.

One other thing I want to talk about in the context of "purposeful partnerships" is peer support.  Supporting each other while we breastfeed our babies.  Supporting our families, friends, neighbours and community members who breastfeed and teaching our young people about breastfeeding.  That can be in person or it can be online.  The kind of virtual communities developing now in breastfeeding support are incredible.  Women supporting other women is incredibly powerful.  When you support someone to breastfeed, whether that is physically helping, emotionally supporting or pointing them to where they can get the help they need - THAT is working to the purpose of WBW2017.  Those are purposeful partnerships, and that also needs celebrated.  I am so proud of the ripples that I see.  I am so proud when I see someone who I supported in some small way months or years ago, pass that information to someone else and lovingly support another person to feed their baby.  Well done to all of you out there doing your part.  Change happens both ways - from the top through political action, and from the bottom, person to person.

Support and compassion can be our watchword, as can clever reaction to media.  The media are well practised in encouraging women to critique other women.   Online media, telephone phone ins, shock jock radio and TV are all about click bait.  More clicks generates more revenue.  They don't care about supporting women or about what babies get human milk and what babies get artificial milk.  It's all about the money.  Don't buy into it.  If you see negative stories - don't share them.  Don't engage.  Create negative pressure.  If you see positive stories, share the hell out of them.  Create positive pressure.  Use the networks and purposeful partnerships to do that.

Let's be very clear.  How we feed our babies matter.  There is a difference to the growing human body between human milk and the modified milk of another mammal.  The research is clear and unequivocal, no matter how the media presents it.  Breastfeeding protects against child infections, malocclusions, cancers, diabetes, and is associated with higher performance on intelligence tests, even when maternal IQ is accounted for.  

Each year WBW leaves me conflicted, but perhaps that's because I haven't really responded to the fact that WBW is actually a Call To Action, and it is about new action each year.  Not just about celebratory words and photos but action which generates change.  It's about reinvigorating a lobby group which can get worn down during the year.  Each year I find myself disillusioned about the lack of progress since last year.  At the end of WBW this year I've decided to end the conflict by positively undertaking that Call To Action.  I am going to write to my MLAs and MPs this week asking them how protections can be progressed in our current political system.  I will create some pressure.  Will you join me?